- Trump Rules Open Higher Education to New Accreditors; “Secret Weapon”
- Sex without consent is rape — a serious UK criminal offence
- Official: ‘People are suffering. I can’t say things are going well.’
- New Ruling Partially Rolls Back NFA Restrictions, For Now
- Leftist Texas Senate Candidate’s Sympathy Tied to Past Legal Trouble
- China Commercializes Data for Trade, Intel and Military, Congress Says
- Disney lawsuit: FCC pressure halted ‘The View’ bookings
- Ukraine Prepares Energy Grid Early for Russian Winter Attacks
Author: Brittany Mays
Brittany Mays is a dedicated mother and passionate conservative news and opinion writer. With a sharp eye for current events and a commitment to traditional values, Brittany delivers thoughtful commentary on the issues shaping today’s world. Balancing her role as a parent with her love for writing, she strives to inspire others with her insights on faith, family, and freedom.
A clear-eyed look at the growing talk that Kamala Harris and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez could end up on a Democratic 2028 ticket and why Republicans should not treat that as a joke. Talk of a Harris–AOC ticket used to be a punchline, but the political wind has shifted enough that it’s now a strategic question, not just comedy. Progressives have been organizing, winning primaries, and staking out positions that attract young voters in a way traditional Democrats have not. That changes the math going into 2028 and means the GOP needs a plan beyond laughter. The left’s momentum is real: grassroots…
We lay out a clear, plainspoken case for defending our country against collectivist threats while keeping liberty, prosperity, and national strength front and center. The argument starts with a simple premise: America lasts when free institutions and personal responsibility do. That means rejecting systems that replace individual choice with centralized control and setting policies that reward work, thrift, and innovation. This is not about slogans, it is about preserving a way of life that has delivered prosperity for generations. History shows the cost of tolerating ideologies that undermine freedom, and the American response should be firm. “If we are to…
President Trump’s blunt approach to NATO, the upcoming summit in Turkey, and Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s maneuvering are colliding at a delicate moment for U.S. interests and alliance cohesion. President Trump has berated and belittled many of his European counterparts expected to attend next week’s NATO summit in Turkey. But host Recep Tayyip Erdogan has drawn on his close ties with th Trump’s style is loud and direct, and that’s part of the story here. From a Republican perspective, his blunt reminders about burden-sharing have forced an honest conversation about who carries the cost of collective defense. European leaders bristle at…
A three-armed spacecraft rocketed into orbit Friday to rescue a NASA telescope that’s in danger of crashing back to Earth. The spacecraft’s launch marks a clear shift in how agencies plan to protect and extend the life of vital space assets. Engineers built the vehicle with three robotic arms so it can reach, grasp, and stabilize a failing observatory without relying on fragile manual procedures. The mission is designed to buy time and capability for a telescope that otherwise faces an uncontrolled return to Earth. Once on station, the robotic arms will perform delicate maneuvers to secure the telescope and…
America’s quarter-millennium experiment still hums with promise even as political tempers flare, and that living experiment depends on citizens who choose to preserve liberty, local institutions, and the rule of law rather than surrendering to anger or apathy. The country that began in 1776 was meant to be self-correcting and resilient, built on checks and balances and the expectation that ordinary people would steward their communities. Those structures have survived wars, depressions, and bitter political fights, proving the design durable when citizens care enough to show up. Today, the question is whether we will act like the stewards our ancestors…
A concise look at the 250-year American experiment in liberty, the Constitution that made it possible, and the ideas that kept it resilient. Two hundred and fifty years in, America still fascinates because it didn’t just survive chaos and conflict — it grew through them. The founders set up a framework that prized limited government, individual rights, and a system of checks and balances that forced compromise and accountability. That mix has produced stability and prosperity most rivals envy. We should be blunt: this experiment depends on civic virtue as much as institutions, and those virtues aren’t automatic. Citizens who…
America’s 250th birthday is shaping up as a big mix of pageantry, private celebration, and sober reminders of the founding principles that built this country, with communities and leaders preparing parades, concerts, and civic events around July 2026. Festivities are already being planned in towns and cities across the nation, and the mood is a blend of pride and careful organization. Communities are leaning on volunteer networks, local nonprofits, and private sponsorships to stage events that celebrate heritage without bloated federal interference. The focus in many places is on music, historical reenactments, and family-friendly public gatherings that highlight local traditions.…
Federal courts and the Supreme Court have recently blocked several of the administration’s moves to reshape vote-by-mail rules, while Congress has stalled on legislative fixes, leaving an election-security fight splintered across the branches. President Trump pushed hard this spring to constrain mail ballot delivery when states wouldn’t share voter data, and Postmaster General David Steiner announced a policy on June 24 aimed at enforcing that demand. Within days the courts pushed back, and judges in multiple districts issued rulings that undercut both the USPS policy and parts of a presidential executive order. That string of courtroom losses has turned a…
Alex Vatanka, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute, speaks about the aftermath of recent U.S.-Iran tensions, weighing whether Tehran has accomplished strategic goals and examining how mistaken assumptions shaped American political reactions. Alex Vatanka, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute, joins the conversation with clear-eyed analysis about where Iran stands after its recent actions and responses from Washington. His perspective focuses on political signaling, regional influence, and the military and diplomatic measures used by both sides. Vatanka’s assessment presses the question of whether Iran’s moves amount to a strategic win. The core of the debate is…
On June 25 the Supreme Court ruled 6 to 3 to allow the administration to end Temporary Protected Status for Haitians and Syrians, and powerful local leaders immediately pushed back, exposing a raw split over whether court rulings bind those who govern. The justices’ decision came down on June 25 and cleared the way for the Trump administration to remove the deportation shield that had let people from disaster-hit or war-torn nations live and work here legally. Within hours New York City’s mayor declared the ruling “not something we will ever accept.” That reaction set off a fierce debate about…