Author: Karen Givens

Graduate Student, wife, engaged political and legal writer.

This week produced a tidal wave of reports and testimony that paint the Biden presidency as a period of political protectionism and institutional abuse, with one side shielded while the other was pummeled by federal power. Between revelations about Biden’s health handling and the scope of Jack Smith’s probes, the pattern looks like selective enforcement and a Justice Department used as a political weapon. Too many Americans missed the scale of what unfolded because the mainstream press barely scratched the surface. The pieces revealed this week stack up: internal decisions to hide or limit access around the president’s fitness, and…

Read More

The court fights that sidelined a presidential campaign reveal more than legal arguments; they show how partisan litigation can reshape politics and voters’ choices when the system is weaponized. This article argues from a Republican perspective that those actions had clear political consequences, disrupted campaigning, and raised urgent questions about fairness. It looks at the mechanics of the legal attacks, the responses from voters and allies, and what this pattern means for future elections. It’s reminiscent of when Donald Trump was kept from campaigning in 2024 because Democrats tied him up in court. That moment highlighted a new reality where…

Read More

“A jury in California convicted an animal rights activist on Wednesday of stealing four chickens from a poultry plant in 2023.” This article explains the conviction and the broader tensions it highlights between animal advocacy and property law. It looks at what such a conviction can mean for activists, farmers, and the legal system without inventing new facts. The conviction centers on an act that many activists describe as rescue and many owners call theft. Property and animal welfare collide when someone removes animals from a facility without permission, and courts are left to sort through competing values. This case…

Read More

All six attorneys who signed the subpoenas released Wednesday are no longer employed by the DOJ. This development raises immediate questions about personnel practices, internal accountability, and whether the department’s handling of sensitive legal actions is consistent and transparent. The departure of those attorneys also changes who can be questioned about the records and decisions tied to those subpoenas. Republicans and critics will view this as a sign that more oversight and answers are needed from the Justice Department. The sudden absence of these six attorneys creates a gap in institutional memory. When key signers of subpoenas leave, reconstructing the…

Read More

Federal officials have extended the National Guard deployment in the District through February, canceling plans for the roughly 2,400 troops to go home by the end of next month. This update changes the timeline and raises immediate questions about who decides security needs in the capital. The move has sparked debate over local control, civil liberties, and the cost of prolonged federal involvement. For Republicans watching this unfold, the optics are troubling and the policy choices are worth hard scrutiny. We value strong, accountable responses to real threats, but long deployments without clear, public justification set a dangerous precedent. The…

Read More

This article looks at recent tensions around the Gaza ceasefire after both Israel and Hamas publicly accepted President Donald Trump’s 20-point peace plan earlier this month, then quickly ran into trouble when Israel accused Hamas of staging the return of a dead hostage and resumed airstrikes. It tracks the incomplete handover of remains—15 of 28 bodies so far—the killing of Israeli soldiers, graphic executions in Gaza, and a U.S. State Department warning about credible plots against civilians. The developments have put the fragile agreement under stress and raised questions about enforcement and accountability. The situation shows how fragile mediated deals…

Read More

President Donald Trump abruptly ended trade talks with Canada after an Ontario television ad used excerpts from Ronald Reagan’s 1987 radio address to suggest Reagan opposed tariffs; the ad’s accuracy is now a political flashpoint, with outlets and commentators sharply divided over whether the ad leaves a misleading impression or simply reuses Reagan’s own words. Media fact-checks and conservative critiques both point to the same source material, while the Reagan Presidential Foundation has called the ad a misrepresentation and is weighing legal options. The showdown highlights how historical clips can be repurposed in modern trade fights and why messaging matters…

Read More

Washington intends to trim the number of U.S. troops stationed on NATO’s eastern flank in Europe, a move Romanian officials say reflects the Trump administration’s reassessment of deployments and priorities. The decision shifts the conversation from permanent presence to smarter posture, balancing deterrence with deterrence that is sustainable and targeted. This article unpacks what the change means for allies, for military readiness, and for the politics of burden sharing. The announcement signals a strategic rethink, not a retreat, from a conservative perspective that values fiscal responsibility and clear priorities. Reducing troop numbers can free resources for higher-end capabilities the U.S.…

Read More

The argument here is simple: the Democratic Party’s antipathy toward core American institutions and traditions makes it hard for its leaders to claim the patriotism high ground against President Trump. This piece outlines where that tension shows up, how it affects messaging, and why it matters for voters who care about national unity and constitutional fidelity. The core claim is direct: “The anti-Americanism within the Democrat Party leaves no room for its members to play the patriotism card in opposition to Trump.” That line captures a belief held by many conservatives who see party moves and rhetoric that clash with…

Read More

President Trump’s clear pivot to Latin America has meant bold action against narcoterrorist networks, including recent drone strikes in the Atlantic and Pacific. Those strikes, backed by a decades-long policy of offensive counterterrorism, are framed as necessary to disrupt cartel ties to Hezbollah and state sponsors like Venezuela while pushing back on Chinese influence in the region. The latest strike hit a boat in the Pacific Ocean, wiping out 14 people and leaving one survivor, and it stands as the deadliest action so far. That operation underlines the administration’s view that cartel leaders are not ordinary criminals but organized threats…

Read More