Lawsuit Claims Idaho Army National Guard Banned Christians from Command

Idaho has long been recognized as a stronghold of conservative values. It consistently supports Republican presidential candidates, and even some counties in Oregon view it as a haven of conservatism, contemplating joining the state. This political backdrop makes a recent lawsuit involving the Idaho Army National Guard particularly noteworthy.

An officer from the Guard is taking legal action against Idaho’s governor and two generals. The officer claims he was unfairly removed from his command due to his Christian beliefs. The Liberty Counsel, representing him, announced the lawsuit, emphasizing how the decision reflects a troubling stance against Christian ideals.

Major David Worley, the officer in question, had previously run for mayor of Pocatello, where he voiced opposition to various liberal policies. His comments, which were made outside his military role, included criticisms of drag queen story hours and transgender treatments for minors. These views, however, sparked controversy within the ranks.

A subordinate under Worley, identifying as gay, filed a discrimination complaint against him. Following this, the Idaho Army National Guard suspended Worley from his command in mid-2023. The lawsuit argues that this action was part of a broader initiative to screen command candidates for their Christian beliefs.

The investigation allegedly recommended excluding Christians from leadership roles within the Guard. The rationale was that Christian views on sexuality were seen as “concerning ideologies.” This suggests a deeper, institutional bias against Christian officers in leadership positions.

Worley’s beliefs, rooted in biblical teachings, were cited as the primary reason for his removal. The current societal divide often brands Christians who do not support LGBTQ lifestyles as extremists. Yet, expressing one’s faith should not be mistaken for discrimination.

This case is emblematic of a larger struggle for religious freedom, affecting many beyond just Worley. A policy that excludes Christians from command positions overlooks the qualifications many of them possess. The Constitution protects the right to religious belief, a right that should remain unaltered by military service.

Idaho legislators are attuned to the implications of this case. They recognize it as a constitutional breach. However, the Idaho Army National Guard has refrained from commenting on the ongoing litigation.

Liberty Counsel’s Mat Staver highlighted that military personnel do not forfeit their constitutional rights. He pointed out that the military’s actions against Worley could be seen as an informal “No Christians in Command” policy. The Constitution prohibits the military from discriminating based on religious beliefs.

Governor Brad Little is urged to ensure adherence to both federal and state laws protecting service members’ free speech. The demand is clear: halt the discrimination against Major Worley and restore his military career. The case is a critical test of religious liberty within the military.

Observers are closely watching the lawsuit’s progression through the courts. Many hope for a resolution that reaffirms the rights of service members to hold and express religious beliefs. The outcome could set a significant precedent for religious freedom in the military.

In an era where religious liberty faces challenges, standing up for constitutional rights is paramount. Organizations like PJ Media are committed to highlighting these critical issues. They encourage engagement and support through membership, which offers exclusive insights and benefits.

As this story unfolds, the importance of defending religious freedom remains at the forefront. Keeping informed and supporting those who champion these rights is crucial. The case of Major Worley underscores the ongoing battle for religious liberty in today’s society.