Author: Brittany Mays

Brittany Mays is a dedicated mother and passionate conservative news and opinion writer. With a sharp eye for current events and a commitment to traditional values, Brittany delivers thoughtful commentary on the issues shaping today’s world. Balancing her role as a parent with her love for writing, she strives to inspire others with her insights on faith, family, and freedom.

If you’ve been following the news this week, it might look like we’re losing the fight against the kind of fraud you remember from Nick Shirley’s visit to that government-funded Quality Learing Center. In Minnesota, two remarkable sentences delivered by the same federal judge in the “Feeding the Future” scandal make stealing from the government feel routine again, and that erosion of trust demands tough answers. Seeing public funds diverted from hungry families into the pockets of scammers is infuriating and unacceptable. The “Feeding the Future” case shows how complex federal programs create gaps that bad actors exploit, and that’s…

Read More

Washington has quietly removed sanctions on one of Venezuela’s top officials, a move that shifts how the U.S. deals with Caracas and raises immediate political and strategic questions. The U.S. on Wednesday lifted sanctions on Venezuela’s acting President Delcy Rodriguez, according to an Office of Foreign Assets Control entry on the Treasury Department website. That specific, official notice is the kind of paper trail that signals an intentional change in policy rather than an offhand adjustment. The timing and terse public explanation leave plenty of room for debate about intent and consequence. Delcy Rodriguez is a longstanding figure in the…

Read More

A brisk look back at a decade that keeps bubbling up in trivia games, memory reels, and cultural shorthand. Trivia this week – the 1960s or whatever the panel may have heard of or remembered. That line sets the tone: a playful, slightly skeptical nudge at how we recall a decade packed with big moments, pop culture storms, and just enough myth to make any quiz night interesting. This piece walks through the highlights, oddities, and lasting images people tend to pull from the era, all without getting bogged down in every detail. Think of it as a tidy road…

Read More

A concise look at the dispute over Jackson’s dissent and what it means for clinicians, patients, and public policy. In a blunt line that has circulated widely, “The gist of Jackson’s dissent is that therapists challenging transgender orthodoxy need to shut up and trust the science.” That sentence sparked a debate about whether courts should be telling clinicians how to practice and what counts as acceptable medical opinion. The controversy touches on free speech, clinical judgment, and who gets to decide what is scientific consensus. Jackson’s message, as quoted, reads like a mandate rather than a legal analysis, and that…

Read More

Rep. Susie Lee posted a profanity-filled message criticizing President Trump just before the Supreme Court held a hearing on birthright citizenship, a post she later deleted but which raised immediate questions about tone, accountability, and the political stakes around the legal fight over who is a citizen at birth. Republicans saw the deleted post as more than a private vent. It looked like a public snapshot of how some Democrats react when the courts take up an issue they don’t like, and that matters when optics shape voter trust. The episode put a spotlight on tone and messaging from elected…

Read More

Americans’ trust in Washington is tanking while the public wants election checks enforced, and politicians keep taking a break. Americans are fed up: 80 percent disapprove of Congress, and that sour mood is obvious in day-to-day headlines and downtown conversations. At the same time, 80 percent of voters support voter verification measures, showing the public wants concrete steps to protect elections. Yet when lawmakers get a chance to respond, many choose vacations over meaningful fixes. This split is not subtle. Voters expect their representatives to tackle basic responsibilities, like keeping voter rolls accurate and preventing fraud, but too many in…

Read More

Recalls touch many parts of daily life, from food and toys to cars and medicines, and this article takes a clear, practical look at how recalls happen, who issues them, what consumers should do when affected, and how to limit future risk. Product recalls are a steady part of the marketplace and they crop up across food, consumer goods, vehicles, and medical products. Regulators and manufacturers both issue recalls when a safety defect or contamination threat is identified. Understanding the basic recall process helps you act fast and protect your family or household. Recalls usually start when a company or…

Read More

Senate inaction has left the SAVE America Act stalled, the Department of Homeland Security including ICE and Border Patrol unfunded, and dozens of Trump nominees stuck in limbo while leadership has not delivered decisive movement. The Senate’s current posture makes clear that major priorities are not advancing at the pace the country needs, and the SAVE America Act continues to sit without the traction required to become law. At the same time, the Department of Homeland Security, which includes ICE and Border Patrol, remains without full funding, creating gaps in operations and planning. Dozens of Trump nominees await Senate confirmation,…

Read More

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Monday that the U.S. will ultimately retake control of the Strait of Hormuz bordering Iran and restore freedom of navigation, even as ship traffic through the corridor remains under strain. The Strait of Hormuz sits at the center of a global security and economic flashpoint, and recent incidents have made clear that Washington sees direct action as a legitimate option. From a Republican viewpoint, the message is simple: America will not tolerate disruptions to trade or threats to allied shipping lanes. The statement by Scott Bessent signals a readiness to move from rhetoric to tangible…

Read More

Investigations into attempts on a President’s life raise hard questions about how well presidential protection actually works and whether accountability and clear action follow when those protections fail. Every attempted attack on a President forces a reassessment of what went wrong and who is accountable, and those reassessments often reveal gaps between policy and practice. Americans expect the highest level of protection for the office, and investigations are where the discrepancies show up. Looking back at past probes, patterns emerge around communication breakdowns, unclear responsibilities, and sluggish corrective measures. Security teams operate under intense pressure, and most agents perform admirably…

Read More