James Clapper, the former Director of National Intelligence, sent an email just two months after Donald Trump won the 2016 election, discussing the investigation into alleged Russian collusion. This email, kept under wraps until recently, has been released by current DNI Tulsi Gabbard. She’s been diligently working to expose the origins of the Russiagate scandal and hold accountable the Obama administration officials involved.
In the email, Clapper communicated with former CIA Director John Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey, among others. He stated, “The decision to compromise standards and violate protocols in the creation of the 2017 manufactured intelligence assessment was deliberate and came from the very top.” This revelation has sparked a renewed interest in how the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) was crafted.
Tulsi Gabbard has been vocal about her findings, saying that the emails reveal how Clapper pressured the intelligence community to support the Russia Hoax narrative. She quoted Clapper’s description of the effort as a “team sport” and noted his insistence on compromising “normal modalities.” These statements raise questions about the integrity of the intelligence assessments that were used to justify the Russiagate narrative.
The email was a response to concerns voiced by Mike Rogers, then the director of the National Security Agency. Rogers had expressed worries that the NSA did not have “sufficient access” to the underlying intelligence. He also mentioned that his team wasn’t “fully comfortable saying that they have had enough time to review all of the intelligence to be absolutely confident in their assessments.”
In a related interview, Gabbard shared with Glenn Beck the evidence she has gathered, stored in what she referred to as “burn bags,” indicating the sensitive nature of the information. She emphasized that the key figures in the Russia hoax have been misleading the American people for years. By presenting politicized assessments as credible intelligence, they have shaped public perception based on falsehoods.
Gabbard’s press release further highlighted that the email supports the notion of a deliberate effort to compromise intelligence standards. “The decision to compromise standards and violate protocols in the creation of the 2017 manufactured intelligence assessment was deliberate and came from the very top,” she reiterated. This suggests a coordinated effort to influence the narrative surrounding Trump’s presidency.
Despite this bombshell revelation, Clapper has not responded to Fox News Digital’s request for comment. His silence adds another layer of intrigue to the unfolding story. As Gabbard continues to reveal more details, the implications of this investigation could have far-reaching consequences.
In the conservative community, there’s a growing call for accountability and transparency regarding the origins of the Russiagate scandal. Many believe that this incident highlights the need for reform within the intelligence community. By addressing these issues, they hope to restore trust and ensure that intelligence assessments are free from political bias.
The release of Clapper’s email serves as a reminder of the complexities and challenges within national intelligence operations. It underscores the importance of adhering to standards and protocols to maintain the credibility of intelligence findings. As more information comes to light, there will likely be increased scrutiny on those involved in the creation of the 2017 ICA.
This situation has also reignited debates about the role of government officials in shaping public narratives. The potential misuse of intelligence to advance political agendas is a concern that resonates with many Americans. Ensuring that intelligence agencies operate with integrity is crucial for the health of the nation’s democracy.
As Gabbard continues her investigation, she has gained support from conservative circles. Her efforts are seen as a necessary step to uncover the truth and hold accountable those who have misled the public. The significance of these revelations cannot be understated, as they challenge the legitimacy of previous intelligence assessments.
The uncovering of this email and its contents have brought renewed focus on the actions of the Obama administration. For many conservatives, this is a validation of their long-held belief that the Russiagate scandal was orchestrated for political purposes. The truth, they argue, is finally coming to light.
The integrity of the intelligence community is critical to national security and public trust. The revelations from Gabbard’s investigation serve as a cautionary tale about the dangers of politicizing intelligence. Moving forward, the focus will be on ensuring that intelligence assessments are based on facts, not political agendas.
For those invested in this issue, the unfolding story is a testament to the importance of vigilance and accountability in government. As more details emerge, the pressure will be on to address any wrongdoing and implement necessary reforms. The outcome of this investigation could have significant implications for the future of U.S. intelligence operations.
In the meantime, the conservative community remains watchful, eager to see how the situation develops. The exposure of any misconduct is viewed as a victory for those advocating for transparency and truth. As the investigation progresses, the hope is that it will lead to meaningful changes within the intelligence community.
The revelations from Clapper’s email have already begun to reshape the narrative surrounding the Russiagate scandal. For many, this is a moment of vindication, confirming suspicions of political interference in intelligence matters. The quest for truth continues, with Gabbard leading the charge to uncover the full extent of the scandal.
Ultimately, the outcome of this investigation will have lasting effects on the perception of the intelligence community. By holding those responsible accountable, there is an opportunity to restore faith in the institutions tasked with safeguarding the nation’s security. As the details unfold, the spotlight will remain on the key players involved in the creation of the 2017 ICA.
1 Comment
It is most disquieting, that CIA and NSA are unaware that email never go away. What else has been left out there ?