- Spencer Pratt Blames Bass, Raman After Office Fire
- Beyond the Recession: Canada’s Deepening Economic Decay
- Europeans Urge Gratitude Ahead of America’s 250th Celebration
- Supreme Court Blocks Alabama Nitrogen Execution; Ivey Frustrated
- Dem Super PAC Spending $50M Targeting GOP 12+ House, 4 Senate Races
- “This terrible case” shows mifepristone dangers, AG Murrill
- Section 702 Lapses After House Rejects Short-Term Extension
- US-Iran Peace Accord: Signing Delayed Amid Disputes
Author: Kevin Parker
Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim condemned Norway’s decision to revoke the export license for a naval missile system for Malaysia’s navy, saying the move risks undermining confidence in defense trade and partnerships. Malaysian leader Anwar Ibrahim criticized Norway’s recent revocation of an export license tied to a naval missile system for Malaysia’s navy, framing it as a step that could erode trust between states that buy and sell defensive equipment. The decision has raised questions about how political shifts affect defense contracts and whether suppliers can be relied on when geopolitics change. The reaction in Kuala Lumpur reflects wider unease…
House Republicans divided over a proposal to expand E15 sales, with corn-state lawmakers pushing for bigger ethanol markets while conservative members worry about federal meddling, costs, and unintended consequences. The debate over E15 turned into a full-on intra-party clash, exposing a sharp split between representatives who represent farm country and those who prioritize limited government and market discipline. Supporters from corn-growing states argue the blend delivers jobs, higher demand for crops, and a boost to rural economies. Critics counter that the push represents another Washington-driven market shift with uncertain benefits for ordinary drivers. E15 refers to gasoline blended with up…
President Trump left written instructions for Vice President J.D. Vance inside the Resolute Desk, according to a senior White House official, a detail that has stirred strong reactions and raised questions about continuity, symbolism, and the seriousness of contingency planning in the current political climate. “President Trump has left written instructions for Vice President J.D. Vance inside the Resolute Desk should he ever be killed in office, a senior White House official revealed Wednesday.” That line landed hard because it is blunt and literal, and it shows a level of preparation some critics call dramatic and some supporters call responsible.…
The Gerrymandering Arms Race: Two sides, one goal, no hope. This piece looks at how both parties are racing to redraw power, and why that race has practical costs for voters. The battle over maps is now a tech-enabled contest that keeps politics inside closed rooms instead of open debate. Gerrymandering has evolved from crude carve-ups to a precise, data-driven effort that rigs outcomes before a single vote is cast. Modern mapping tools let mapmakers slice communities into neat partisan blocs, locking in advantages for the party in charge. The result is fewer competitive seats and less incentive for politicians…
Senate Majority Leader John Thune said “We don’t have the votes to get rid of the filibuster,” and Republicans are debating whether that is a sincere limit or a convenient way to stall the SAVE America Act. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., told reporters Tuesday, “We don’t have the votes to get rid of the filibuster,” and he used that line to explain why he won’t move the SAVE America Act forward. That admission landed hard with conservatives who expected leadership to press for measures that protect election integrity and public safety. The short version: rank-and-file conservatives see a…
The South Carolina Supreme Court on Wednesday overturned the murder convictions and life sentence of disgraced lawyer Alex Murdaugh in the shooting deaths of his wife and younger son. The South Carolina Supreme Court’s ruling sent shockwaves through a case that gripped the state and drew national attention. The decision removed the murder convictions and the life sentence that had been handed down in one of the most closely watched criminal trials in recent memory. Reactions were swift, split between relief from those who saw legal flaws and outrage from people who believed justice had been served. Whatever comes next,…
Donald Trump’s trip to Beijing landed with a mix of bold leverage abroad and urgent counterintelligence work at home, set against a China that is weaker than the media headlines suggest. Trump arrived in Beijing with a high-profile corporate delegation and a tight agenda: trade, technology, rare-earth export controls, Taiwan, the Iran war, and artificial intelligence. He is the first sitting American president to visit since 2017, and Xi Jinping is expected to return the visit later this year. Big outlets rolled out a familiar narrative framing the trip as fraught and favoring China, but that picture misses key leverage…
Virginia’s appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court has been poorly handled, marked by sloppy filings and contradictory legal arguments that undermine the state’s position and confuse the court. The appeal from Virginia up to the U.S. Supreme Court reads like a patchwork of competing rationales rather than a single coherent legal theory. That kind of inconsistency makes it easy for opponents to pick apart the case and for justices to question the state’s credibility. When a government litigant is unclear, the courts notice and the public pays the price in time and confidence. First, the technical mistakes stand out. Missed…
Republican observers point to a new lawsuit challenging Illinois’ legislative map on constitutional grounds and lay out why the case matters for fairness, legal precedent, and voter equality. ‘Illinois has districting criteria that violates the United States Constitution explicitly by elevating race as a primary purpose in legislative line drawing,’ a new lawsuit alleges. The complaint accuses Illinois policymakers of making race the central factor when drawing legislative districts, a move critics say undercuts equal treatment under the law. From a Republican perspective, that is a direct affront to the principle that law should treat citizens as individuals, not as…
Dems’ reported plan to stack the VA Supreme Court is an omen for what they plan to do to SCOTUS should they retake trifecta control of the federal government. What we are watching in Virginia is not an isolated skirmish over judges. It looks like a deliberate strategy to change the rules of the courtroom so outcomes swing toward a partisan agenda. That matters because courts decide long after elections are over and the voters move on. When a party treats judges as political appointments instead of impartial referees, the result is weakened trust in the system. Citizens expect judges…